References

Alberta Society of Professional Biologists. (2011). Code of Ethics.                                   https://www.aspb.ab.ca/code-of-ethics

Ali, P.A., & Watson, R. (2016). Peer review and the publication process. Nursing Open, 3, 193-202. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/nop2.51

Aliyo, A., & Edin, A. (2023). Assessment of Safety Requirements and Their Practices  Among Teaching Laboratories of Health Institutes. Microbiology insights, 16, https://doi.org/10.1177/11786361231174414

Arvind, D.G. (2019, August 23). Inaccurate data has serious impacts on conservation models. Wildlife conservation society – India. https://programs.wcs.org/india-beta/Newsroom/Blog/ID/13000/Inaccurate-data-has-serious-impacts-on-conservation-models

Asplund, M., & Welle, C. G. (2018). Advancing Science: How Bias Holds Us Back. Neuron, 99(4), 635–639. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2018.07.045 

Baldwin, I. (2020). Discovery of Electricity and the Electromagnetic Force: Its Importance for Environmentalists, Educators, Physicians, Politicians and, Citizens. Advances in Social Sciences Research Journal, 7(12), 362-383,  https://doi.org/10.14738/assrj.712.9532

Batty, L., & Reilly, K. (2022). Understanding barriers to participation within undergraduate STEM laboratories: towards development of an inclusive curriculum. Journal of Biological Education, 57(5), 1147–1169. https://doi.org/10.1080/00219266.2021.2012227

Bazerman, M.H. & Tenbrunsel, A.E. (2012). The gap between intended and actual ethical behaviour. In Blind spots: Why we fail to do what’s right and what to do about it. (pp. 1-23). Princeton University Press. ISBN: 1400837995, 9781400837991

Beckwith, J. (2001). On the Social Responsibility of Scientists. Annali dell’Istituto Superiore di Sanità, 37(2), 189-194. https://www.iss.it/documents/20126/955767/372189.1108978978.pdf/bf25ace8-4fde-d711-fe6e-b7503c14da0e?t=1575579266740

Bell, B., Brinkman, J., van Nie, A. & O’Hara, P. (2014 – updated 2022). Conflicts of Interest – Responsible Conduct of Research. CITI program. https://about.citiprogram.org/course/responsible-conduct-of-research-basic/

Benderly, B. (2016, July 7). Report on UH lab explosion reveals deep, systemic safety failures. Science. https://www.science.org/content/article/report-uh-lab-explosion-reveals-deep-systemic-safety-failures

Bennett, D. & Taylor, D. (2003). Unethical practices in authorship of scientific papers. Emergency Medicine, 15(3), 263-270. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1442-2026.2003.00432.x

Bird S. J. (2014). Socially responsible science is more than “good science”. Journal of microbiology & biology education, 15(2), 169–172.                https://doi.org/10.1128/jmbe.v15i2.870

Bird, S. & Bell, E. (2014 – updated 2022). Publication Practices and Responsible Authorship – Responsible Conduct of Research. CITI program.

Bishop, D. V. M. (2023, February 6). Red flags for paper mills need to go beyond the level of individual articles: a case study of Hindawi special issues. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/6mbgv 

Bocwinkski, R. (2019). Lab Life: Waste Disposal. American Chemical Society. https://inchemistry.acs.org/content/dam/inchemistry/topics/ACS%20and%20You/waste-disposal-infographic.pdf

Bond, M. R., Gammie, A. E., & Lorsch, J. R. (2020). Developing a culture of safety in biomedical research training. Molecular Biology of the Cell, 31(22), 2409–2414. https://doi.org/10.1091/mbc.e20-03-0167

Britannica, T. Editors of Encyclopaedia (2024, May 28). Challenger disaster. Encyclopedia Britannica. https://www.britannica.com/event/Challenger-disaster 

Britnell, J. A., Lewis, R. N., Elsner-gearing, F., Harvey, N., Stanbrook, E., & Shultz, S. (2021). Species stereotypes as a result of unconscious research biases compromise conservation efficacy. Biological Conservation, 261, Article 109275. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2021.109275

Burnham, W., Heffernan, K., Morgan, A., & Russell, E. (2021). Data Fabrication and Falsification. Ethics of Science Writing. https://wp.wpi.edu/sciwritingethics/data-fabrication-and-falsification/

Burrage, J. (2015). Shooting the messenger: the erosion of trust in science and what to do about it. Australasian Physical & Engineering Sciences in Medicine, 38, 1–3. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13246-015-0335-8

Caad, J.B. (2023). Exploring Undergraduate Research Experiences and Perceptions of Responsible and Ethical Conduct of Research (RECR) Education in the Biological Sciences and (Bio)Chemistry Disciplines. Open Access Theses & Dissertations. 3901. https://scholarworks.utep.edu/open_etd/3901

Cairns, A. C., Linville, C., Garcia, T., Bridges, B., Tanona, S., Herington, J., & Laverty, J. T. (2021). A phenomenographic study of scientists’ beliefs about the causes of scientists’ research misconduct. Research Ethics, 17(4), 501-521. https://doi.org/10.1177/17470161211042658 

Canadian Broadcast Corporation (CBC). (2015). R.K. Chandra’s infant formula study withdrawn by medical journal. https://www.cbc.ca/news/health/chandra-rk-bmj-retraction-1.3292833

Carson R. Silent Spring. New York: Houghton-Mifflin; 1962.

Casad, B. J. and Luebering,. J.E. (2024, June 18). Confirmation bias. Encyclopedia Britannica. https://www.britannica.com/science/confirmation-bias

Canadian Broadcast Corporation (CBC). (2015, October 28). R.K. Chandra’s infant formula study withdrawn by medical journal. https://www.cbc.ca/news/health/chandra-rk-bmj-retraction-1.3292833 

CBS Interactive. (2016, December 26). Contamination from buried Dartmouth College Lab Animals Concerns Neighbors. CBS News. https://www.cbsnews.com/boston/news/contamination-buried-dartmouth-college-lab-animals-neighbors/

Charitos, I. A., Ballini, A., Cantore, S., Boccellino, M., Di Domenico, M., Borsani, E., Nocini, R., Di Cosola, M., Santacroce, L., & Bottalico, L. (2021). Stem Cells: A Historical Review about Biological, Religious, and Ethical Issues. Stem cells international, 2021, 9978837. https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/9978837

Chawla, D. (2024). Self-citations in around a dozen countries are unusually high. Nature. https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-024-00090-z

Chugh, D., Bazerman, M. H. & Banaji, M.R. (2005). Bounded ethically as a psychological barrier to recognizing conflicts of interest. In D.A. Moore, D.M. Cain, G. Loewenstein & M.H. Bazerman. (Eds.) Conflicts of interest: Challenges and solutions in business, law, medicine and public policy. (pp. 74-95). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511610332.006

Cipan, V. (2023, May 7). Ethics and ethical data visualization: A complete guide. Viborc.com. https://viborc.com/ethics-and-ethical-data-visualization-a-complete-guide/

COPE. Ethical guidelines for peer reviews. (2017 September). Version 2. https://doi.org/10.24318/cope.2019.1.9

Cox, A. R., Barrandon, O., Cai, E. P., Rios, J. S., Chavez, J., Bonnyman, C. W., Lam, C. J., Yi, P., Melton, D. A., & Kushner, J. A. (2016). Resolving discrepant findings on ANGPTL8 in β-cell proliferation: A collaborative approach to resolving the Betatrophin controversy. PLOS ONE, 11(7). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0159276  

Crameri, F., Shephard, G.E. & Heron, P.J. (2020) The misuse of colour in science communication. Nature Communications. 11(1), 5444. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-020-19160-7

Cushman, R & Bell, E. (2014 – updated 2022). Data management – Responsible Conduct of Research. CITI Program. https://about.citiprogram.org/course/responsible-conduct-of-research-basic/

Dartmouth College. (n.d.). Rennie Farm. Environmental Health and Safety. https://www.dartmouth.edu/ehs/rennie_about.html

DiEuliis, D., & Giordano, J. (2017). Why gene editors like CRISPR/Cas may be a game changer for neuroweapons. Health Security. 15(3). 296-302. https://doi.org/10.1089/hs.2016.0120

Doemeny, L. & Knerr, P. (2017). The Importance of Ethical Conduct in Scientific Research. American Chemical Society. https://www.acs.org/content/dam/acsorg/about/governance/committees/ethics/the -importance-of-ethical-conduct-in-scientific-research-final.pdf

Eaton, A.A., Saunders, J.F., Jacobson, R.K. & West, K. (2020) How Gender and Race Stereotypes Impact the Advancement of Scholars in STEM: Professors’ Biased Evaluations of Physics and Biology Post-Doctoral Candidates. Sex Roles. 82, 127–141. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-019-01052-w

Eggertson, L. (2010). Lancet retracts 12-year-old article linking autism to MMR vaccines. Canadian Medical Association Journal, 182(4), E199-E200. https://doi.org/10.1503/cmaj.109-3179

Elanzeery, H. (2016, June 13). Science in Ancient Egypt & Today: Connecting Eras. Lindau Nobel Laureate Meetings. https://www.lindau-nobel.org/science-in-ancient-egypt-today-connecting-eras/

Eliesbik, A. (2023, August 11). Hindawi’s mass retraction of “Special issues” papers. Science Integrity Digest. https://scienceintegritydigest.com/2023/08/10/hindawis-mass-retraction-of-special-issues-papers/

Elmore, S. A., & Weston, E. H. (2020). Predatory Journals: What They Are and How to Avoid Them. Toxicologic pathology, 48(4), 607–610. https://doi.org/10.1177/0192623320920209

Fanelli, D. (2009). How many scientists fabricate and falsify research? A systematic review and meta-analysis of survey data. PLoS One. 4(5), e5738. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0005738

Ferguson, C. (2014, November 10). “I kind of like that about science:” Harvard diabetes breakthrough muddied by two new papers. Retraction Watch. https://retractionwatch.com/2014/11/10/i-kind-of-like-that-about-science-harvard-diabetes-breakthrough-muddied-by-two-new-papers/ 

FitzGerald, C., Martin, A., Berner, D., & Hurst, S. (2019). Interventions designed to reduce implicit prejudices and implicit stereotypes in real world contexts: a systematic review. BMC psychology, 7(1), 29. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40359-019-0299-7

Flier, J.S. (2022). The Problem of Irreproducible Bioscience Research. Perspectives in Biology and Medicine. 65(3), 373-395. https://doi.org/10.1353/pbm.2022.0032.

Freimuth, V.S., Quinn, S.C., Thomas, S.B., Cole, G., Zook, E., & Duncan, T. (2001). African Americans’ views on research and the Tuskegee Syphilis Study. Social Science & Medicine, 52(5), 797–808. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0277-9536(00)00178-7

Gallup. (2024, July 9). Stem cell research. Gallup.com. https://news.gallup.com/poll/21676/stem-cell-research.aspx

Geological Society of America. (2023). Code of Ethics and Professional Conduct. https://rock.geosociety.org/net/documents/gsa/about/ethics/code-ethics-professional-conduct.pdf?v=20230104

Georgia Tech. Environmental and laboratory safety. Responsible Conduct of Research. (n.d.). https://rcr.gatech.edu/safety

Gino, F., & Bazerman, M. H. (2009). When misconduct goes unnoticed: The acceptability of gradual erosion in others’ unethical behavior. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 45(4), 708–719.

Guiney, P., Goodfellow, W. & Canfield, T.J. An Overview of Confirmation Bias in Science: Examples and Opportunities for Improvement. Society of Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry (SETAC) SCICON2 – SETAC North America 41st Annual Meeting, N/A, N/A, November 15 – 19, 2020. https://cfpub.epa.gov/si/si_public_record_Report.cfm?Lab=CESER&dirEntryId=350904

Gureev, V. N., Lakizo, I. G., & Mazov, N. A. (2019). Unethical authorship in scientific publications (a review of the problem). Scientific and Technical Information Processing, 46(4), 219–232. https://doi.org/10.3103/s0147688219040026

Haase, D. (2023, October 10). Streamlining the laboratory supply chain. Labcompare. https://www.labcompare.com/10-Featured-Articles/607750-Streamlining-the-Laboratory-Supply-Chain/

Han, K., & Kim, M. Y. (2022). Mechanism of the better-than-average effect in moral issues: Asymmetrical causal attribution across moral (vs. immoral) contexts. Acta psychologica, 226, 103575. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2022.103575

Hancock, L., Ralph, N., Armand, M., Macfarlane, D., & Forsyth, M. (2018). In the lab: New ethical and supply chain protocols for battery and Solar Alternative Energy Laboratory Research Policy and practice. Journal of Cleaner Production, 187, 485–495. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.03.097

Hendry, A.P., Gotanda, K.M. & Svensson, E.I. (2017). Human influences on evolution, and the ecological and societal consequences. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B. 372(1712). https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2016.0028

Hofmann, B. (2023). Biases in bioethics: a narrative review. BMC medical ethics, 24(1), 17. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12910-023-00894-0

Hopkins, D.R. (2013). Disease Eradication. The New England Journal of Medicine, 368, 54-63. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMra1200391 

Jobin, A., Ienca, M. & Vayena, E. (2019). The global landscape of AI ethics guidelines. Natural Machine Intelligence. 1(2). 389–399. https://doi.org/10.1038/s42256-019-0088-2 

Johansen, C. K. & Harris, D. E. (2000). Teaching the Ethics of Biology. The American Biology Teacher, 62(5), 352–358. https://doi.org/10.2307/4450918

Kalichman, M., Magnus, P. D., & Plemmons, D. (2001). Authorship. Resources for Research Ethics Education. http://research-ethics.org/topics/authorship/

Kalichman, M. (2016). Resources for research ethics education – data management. http://research-ethics.org/topics/data-management/.

Kalichman, M., Magnus, P. D., & Plemmons, D. (2016). Conflicts of Interest. Resources for Research Ethics Education. http://research-ethics.org/topics/conflicts-of-interest/

Kemsley, J. (2016, December 19). Hawaii explosion cost a researcher an ARM. Chemical & Engineering Global Enterprise. 94(49), 33-33. https://doi.org./10.1021/cen-09449-cover13

Kilin, I. (2022, April 27). The best charts for colour blind viewers. Datylon. https://www.datylon.com/blog/data-visualization-for-colorblind-readers

Kim, J. & Loewenstein, J. (2020). Analogical encoding fosters ethical decision making because improved knowledge of ethical principles increases moral awareness. Journal of Business Ethics. 172, 307-324. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-020-04457-w 

Kincaid, A. E. (2023, December 18). Hindawi reveals process for retracting more than 8,000 paper mill articles. Retraction Watch. https://retractionwatch.com/2023/12/19/hindawi-reveals-process-for-retracting-more-than-8000-paper-mill-articles/

Koziol, M. (2016). “Who is Ranjit Kumar Chandra? A Timeline of Notoriety”. The Retraction Watch Database [Internet]. New York: The Center for Scientific Integrity. https://retractionwatch.com/2016/07/26/who-is-ranjit-kumar-chandra-a-timeline-of-notoriety/

Lew, L. A., Williams, J. S., Stone, J. C., Au, A. K., Pyke, K. E., & MacDonald, M. J. (2022). Examination of sex-specific participant inclusion in Exercise Physiology Endothelial Function Research: A systematic review. Frontiers in Sports and Active Living, 4. https://doi.org/10.3389/fspor.2022.860356  

Macdonald, N.E., Stanwick, R., & Lynk, A. (2014). Canada’s shameful history of nutrition research on residential school children: The need for strong medical ethics in Aboriginal health research. Paediatrics & child health, 19(2), 64. https://doi.org/10.1093/pch/19.2.64 

Malkan, S. (2024, March 19). Internal documents reveal pesticide industry science denial and manipulation: Glyphosate case study. U.S. Right to Know. https://usrtk.org/monsanto/glyphosate-science-denial/

Mannie, K. (2022, July 27). Leading Alzheimer’s theory undermined: did tampering waste 16 years of research? Global News. https://globalnews.ca/news/9016221/alzheimers-research-potential-fraud-sylvain-lesne-tampering/

Marcus, A. (2018, September 27). Journal flags papers, saying authors didn’t adequately disclose ties to Monsanto. Retraction Watch. https://retractionwatch.com/2018/09/27/journal-flags-papers-saying-authors-didnt-adequately-disclose-ties-to-monsanto/#more-72677

Mark, J.J. (2019). Mesopotamian Science and Technology. In The World History Encyclopedia. https://www.worldhistory.org/Mesopotamian_Science/

McKie, R. (2024, February 3). “The situation has become appalling”: Fake scientific papers push research credibility to crisis point. The Guardian. https://www.theguardian.com/science/2024/feb/03/the-situation-has-become-appalling-fake-scientific-papers-push-research-credibility-to-crisis-point

McLeod, V. (2024, April 4). Types of Hazards and Risks in a Laboratory. Lab Manager. https://www.labmanager.com/mission-possible-how-to-improve-sustainability-in-your-lab-31877

Measey, J. (2023) How to publish in Biological Sciences: a guide for the uninitiated. Available from: https://howtopublishscience.org/ Version date: 06 November 2023.

Mehlich, J., Moser, F., Van Tiggelen, B., Campanella, L., & Hopf, H. (2017). The ethical and social dimensions of chemistry: Reflections, Considerations, and clarifications. Chemistry – A European Journal, 23(6), 1210–1218. https://doi.org/10.1002/chem.201605259

Ménard, A. D., & Trant, J. F. (2020). A review and critique of academic lab safety research. Nature chemistry, 12(1), 17-25. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41557-019-0375-x

Meynell, L. & Paron, C. (2023). Applied Ethics Primer. Atlantic Canada Pressbooks Network. https://pressbooks.atlanticoer-relatlantique.ca/aep.

Micklos, D., & Bloomington, I. (2000). Engineering American society: the lesson of eugenics. Nature Reviews Genetics. (1), 153-158. https://doi.org/10.1038/35038589

Miller, S. & Selgelid, M.J. (2007) Ethical and Philosophical Consideration of the Dual-use Dilemma in the Biological Sciences. Science and Engineering Ethics. 13, 523–580. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-007-9043-4

Mooney, C., Eilperin, J., Butler, D., Muyskens, J., Narayanswamy, A., & Ahmed, N. (2021). Countries’ climate pledges built on flawed data, post investigation finds. The Washington Post. Retrieved August 13, 2024, from https://www.washingtonpost.com/climate-environment/interactive/2021/greenhouse-gas-emissions-pledges-data/

MRI Global. (n.d.) Biological Risk Assessment and Biosafety Considerations in the Laboratory. https://uct-cbio.github.io/ngs-academy/uploads/risk_assessment.pdf 

Narejo, A. S., & Aqil, M. (2020). Authorship is a responsibility as much as credit. Saudi journal of anaesthesia, 14(2), 286–287. https://doi.org/10.4103/sja.SJA_96_20

(a)National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine; Division on Earth and Life Studies; Board on Life Sciences; Board on Chemical Sciences and Technology; Committee on Strategies for Identifying and Addressing Potential Biodefense Vulnerabilities P. (2018). Assessment of Concerns Related to Bioweapons that Alter the Human Host. In Biodefense in the Age of Synthetic Biology. Book, National Academies Press (US).

(b)National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine, policy and Global Affairs, Committee on Science, Engineering, medicine, and public policy, committee on responsible science. (2018). Fostering Integrity in Research. National Academies Press.

National Center for Science and Engineering Statistics (NCSES). 2023. Diversity and STEM: Women, Minorities, and Persons with Disabilities 2023. Special Report NSF 23-315. Alexandria, VA: National Science Foundation. Available at https://ncses.nsf.gov/pubs/nsf23315/

National Human Genome Research Institute [NHGRI]. (2021). Eugenics: Its origin and development (1883 – present). Genome.gov. https://www.genome.gov/about-genomics/educational-resources/timelines/eugenics

National Institutes of Health (NIH). (2016). Theme 16 – Research reproducibility. https://oir.nih.gov/system/files/media/file/2021-08/case_studies-2016.pdf

National Research Council (US):Committee on Prudent Practices for Handling, Storage and Disposal of Chemicals in Laboratories. (1995). Disposal of Waste. In Prudent Practices in the Laboratory: Handling and disposal of materials. National Academy Press. https://doi.org/10.17226/4911.

Needleman, H. L., Gunnoe, C., Leviton, A., Reed, R., Peresie, H., Maher, C., & Barrett, P. (1979). Deficits in psychologic and classroom performance of children with elevated dentine lead levels. The New England journal of medicine, 300(13), 689–695. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJM197903293001301

Neves, K., & Amaral, O. B. (2020). Addressing selective reporting of experiments through predefined exclusion criteria. Elife. 9:e56626. https://doi.org/10.7554/elife.56626.sa2

Nisbet, M. (2004). Public Opinion About Stem Cell Research and Human Cloning. Public Opinion Quarterly. 68(1).131–154. https://doi.org/10.1093/poq/nfh009. 

Olimpo, J. T., Diaz-Martinez, L. A., Bhatt, J. M., & D’Arcy, C. E. (2017). Integration of RCR and ethics education into course-based undergraduate research experiences in the Biological Sciences: A needed discussion. Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education, 18(2). https://doi.org/10.1128/jmbe.v18i2.1344

Oransky, I., & Marcus, A. (2023, August 9). There’s far more scientific fraud than anyone wants to admit. The Guardian. https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2023/aug/09/scientific-misconduct-retraction-watch?CMP=share_btn_url

Owens, R. (2024, March 29). 10 good and bad examples of data visualization. Polymer. https://www.polymersearch.com/blog/10-good-and-bad-examples-of-data-visualization

Palumbi, S.R. (2001). Humans as the World’s Greatest Evolutionary Force. Science 293(5536),1786-1790. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.293.5536.1786 

Piller, C. (2022). Blots on a field? Science, 377(6604), 358–363. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.add9993

PLOS One. (n.d.). Guidelines for Reviewers. https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/reviewer-guidelines

Porter, S., Hawkins, A, Bell, B., Brinkman, J., van Nie, A. & O’Hara, P. (2010 – Updated July 2022). Ethics and the Responsible Researcher – Responsible Conduct of Research. CITI Program. https://about.citiprogram.org/course/responsible-conduct-of-research-basic/

Ratner, P. (2017, April 10). “10 Most Dangerous Scientific Experiments in History”. Published in Big Think. https://bigthink.com/hard-science/10-most-dangerous-scientific-experiments-in-history/

Rawat, S., & Meena, S. (2014). Publish or perish: Where are we heading?. Journal of research in medical sciences: the official journal of Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, 19(2), 87–89.

Resnik, D. B., & Elliott, K. C. (2016). The Ethical Challenges of Socially Responsible Science. Accountability in research, 23(1), 31–46. https://doi.org/10.1080/08989621.2014.1002608 

Resnik, D.B. & Shamoo, A.E. (2017). Reproducibility and Research Integrity. Accountability in Research. 24(2),116-123. https://doi.org/10.1080/08989621.2016.1257387

(a) Resnik, D.B. (2020). “Research Ethics Timeline”. National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences. https://www.niehs.nih.gov/research/resources/bioethics/timeline

(b) Resnik, D.B. (2020, December 23). “What is Ethics in Research & Why is it Important?”. National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences. https://www.niehs.nih.gov/research/resources/bioethics/whatis#:~:text=There%20are%20several%20reasons%20why,the%20truth%20and%20minimize%20error.

Resnik, D., & Portier, C. (2023, August 1). Environment, ethics, and human health. The Hastings Center. https://www.thehastingscenter.org/briefingbook/environmental-health/

Scharff, D.P., Mathews, K.J., Jackson, P., Hoffsuemmer, J. Martin, E., & Edwards, D. (2010). More than Tuskegee: understanding mistrust about research participation. Journal of health care for the poor and undeserved, 21(3), 879-897. https://doi.org/10.1353/hpu.0.0323

Schroeder, D., Chatfield, K., Muthuswamy, V. & Kumar, N. K. (2021). Ethics dumping – How not to do research in resource-poor settings. Academics Stand Against Poverty. 1. 32-55. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8089799

Segal, M. (2019, January 24). Neglecting Lab Safety & Training: A Risk Not Worth Taking. SciShield. https://www.scishield.com/community-hub/neglecting-laboratory-priorities-practices-and-training-a-risk-not-worth-taking

Sezer, O., Gino, F., & Bazerman, M. H. (2015). Ethical blind spots: Explaining unintentional unethical behavior. Current Opinion in Psychology, 6, 77-81. https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.copsyc.2015.03.030

Shahzad, M. (2024, February 29). Ethics of data visualization: Avoiding deceptive practices. Digital Analytics Agency. https://www.analyticodigital.com/blog/ethics-of-data-visualization-avoiding-deceptive-practices#:~:text=Ethical%20considerations%20in%20data%20visualization,%2C%20impacting%20decision%2Dmaking%20processes

Shi, L., & Sarangi, M. (2021, January 5). With experiments, comes waste: Scientific waste and where it ends up. MiSciWriters.com. July 22, 2024, https://misciwriters.com/2021/01/05/with-experiments-comes-waste-scientific-waste-and-where-it-ends-up/ 

Shochat, G., & Fournier, S. (2019, March 12). Monsanto’s fight against “severe stigma” of weed-killer had Canadian Connection, documents reveal | CBC News. CBCnews. https://www.cbc.ca/news/health/glyphosate-monsanto-intertek-studies-1.4902229

Sivasubramaniam, S.D., Cosentino, M., Ribeiro, L. & Marino, F. (2021). Unethical practices within medical research and publication – An exploratory study. International Journal for Educational Integrity, 17, 7. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40979-021-00072-y 

Society of Biology. (2012). https://www.rsb.org.uk/images/Code%20of%20Professional%20and%20Ethical%20Conduct.pdf

Statistics How To. (2024, May 12). Misleading graphs: Real life examples. https://www.statisticshowto.com/probability-and-statistics/descriptive-statistics/misleading-graphs/

Stellard, B., & Alfano, A. (2018). Good Genes Bad Science – Episode 12 [Audio Podcast Episode]. In Base Pairs. Cold Spring Harbour Laboratory. https://soundcloud.com/basepairs/12-good-genes-bad-science?utm_source=www.cshl.edu&utm_campaign=wtshare&utm_medium=widget&utm_content=https%253A%252F%252Fsoundcloud.com%252Fbasepairs%252F12-good-genes-bad-science

Timko, P., Korpershoek, K., Ojani, C. and Szolucha, A. (2022), Exploring the extraplanetary: Social studies of outer space. Anthropology Today, 38(3): 9-12. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8322.12726

US Chemical Safety and Hazard Investigation Board. (2011). Texas Tech University Laboratory Explosion. https://www.depts.ttu.edu/research/integrity/csb-response/downloads/report.pdf

WHO Team. (2020, December 13). What is dual-use research of concern? World Health Organization. https://www.who.int/news-room/questions-and-answers/item/what-is-dual-use-research-of-concern

Wiley. (n.d.). What is peer review?. Wiley Authorship Services. https://authorservices.wiley.com/Reviewers/journal-reviewers/what-is-peer-review/index.html

Wilson, R., Adams, M. L., and Pyke, K. E. (2020). Inclusion of female participants in cardiovascular research: A case study of Ontario NSERC- funded programs. Applied Physiology, Nutrition, and Metabolism. 45, 911–914. https://doi.org/10.1139/apnm-2019-0693 

Wolpe, P. (2006). Reasons scientists avoid thinking about ethics. Cell. 125(6). 1023-1025. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2006.06.001 

Yeo, S. (2013, October 3). “Science is not finished until it’s communicated” – UK chief scientist. Climate Home News. https://www.climatechangenews.com/2013/10/03/science-is-not-finished-until-its-communicated-uk-chief-scientist/

Yi, P., Park, J. S., & Melton, D. A. (2013). Retracted: betatrophin: a hormone that controls pancreatic β cell proliferation. Cell, 153(4), 747-758. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2013.04.008 (Retraction published Cell. 2017 Jan 12;168(1-2):326. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2016.12.017)

Zaikowski, L.A. &  Garrett, J.M. (2024). A three-tiered approach to enhance undergraduate education in bioethics. BioScience, 54(10). 942-949. https://doi.org/10.1641/0006-3568(2004)054[0942:atateu]2.0.co;2